Sunday, April 2, 2017

A Freezer Filled With Inaccuracies


Tell the truth and nothing but the truth. It is a reporter’s duty to the public that his work has credible sources. After all, “news is the material that people use to learn and think about the world beyond themselves, the most important quality it can possess is that it be useable and reliable” (50).  Brian Thevenot of The Times-Picayune made a poor effort of finding the journalistic truth. His “Katrina’s body count could reach 10,000”, has a lack of verifiable sources.
            Thevenot’s first statement under scrutiny is the claim that, “Brooks and several other Guardsmen said they had seen between 30 and 40 more bodies in the Convention Center’s freezer.” There is no direct evidence to back up his claim. There are no photographs to document the bodies and Thevenot did not witness the bodies himself. Unfortunately, Thevenot only had observer eyewitness account, which is the least on the hierarchy of seeking journalistic truth.
            Thevenot reports that the “official death count from Hurricane Katrina in Louisiana was 71 as of Monday evening, but that included only those bodies that had been brought to a make-shift morgue in St. Gabriel.” Once again, this is an example of unverifiable reporting. Where did the official death count come from? Did he get this information from the morgue? Did he receive the information from an accredited government agency? He gives no information as to the source on these numerical figures.                                                                                                                                                          Not only is it imperative to provide the public with accurate information, it is equally important for a reporter to use trustworthy sources. It is up to a reporter to evaluate his sources and to not be duped. Thevenot uses a myriad of sources that appear to be credible. These sources include: Arkansas National Guardsman Mikel Brooks, Daniel Martinez, a spokesman for FEMA, Mayor Ray Nagin of New Orleans, Captain Timothy Bayard, Deputy Chiefs Warren Riley and Steve Nicholas, all of the New Orleans Police Department, and Lt. Governor Mitch Landrieu. A few of these sources gave information without verifying their claims.                                                                                              The first instance of an unverifiable claim is from Mayor Ray Nagin. He states, “the storm may have claimed more than 10,000 lives,” yet, Thevenot does not verify Nagin’s assertion. As a journalist, it is Thevenot’s job to support assertions with evidence. He fails to do so with Nagin. Following in the footsteps of they mayor, Capt. Timothy Bayard also makes an unverified claim. He says, “The highest concentration of casualties from Hurricane Katrina likely will come in the Lower 9th Ward, St. Bernard Parish.” Once again, Thevenot does not give any evidence of this being true. He simply takes Bayard’s assertion as absolute truth. He goes on to report “Lt. Governor Mitch Landrieu said ‘more than a thousand’ people had died in St. Bernard.” Both Bayard and Landrieu do not give any evidence that these assertions are true.                                                                                       Thevenot makes another journalist error when he reports that, “Officials surmised the drowning victims had tried to stay together.” These “officials” remain anonymous and unverifiable. An official can be any person with supposable authority. Not only are they classified as officials, but they are not completely sure as to what happened to the victims. To surmise is to assume something without any evidence.  In other words, they are making a guess.                                                                                                            Thevenot continues to weaken his own reporting by including anonymous sources and the usage of indirect evidence. Mikel Brooks, the National Guardsman from Arkansas, and his unnamed “comrades” was told “a girl they estimated to be 5 years old. Though they could not confirm it, they had heard she was gang-raped.” Not only are Brooks’ comrades unnamed, but also they heard that the 5-year old girl was assaulted from an elderly woman. The older woman is not named, is not interviewed, and therefore, not a reliable source. This is information that Thevenot should have never included in his article. This is considered to be “hearsay testimony” even less than secondhand testimony. The older woman may not be alive or even exist.                                                    Each and every journalist knows that truth is of the utmost importance. According to Kovach and Rosenstiel, “Journalism’s first obligation is to the truth” (49). Sadly, Thevenot’s news article lacks truth. His sources are not all reliable. There was a great deal of hearsay from sources that held titles of prestige. The article did not include “a practical or functional form of truth (56). Next time, Thevenot will look into the freezer himself in order to avoid inaccuracies in his reporting. 









 
Works Cited:
            Kovach, Bill, and Tom Rosenstiel. "Journalism of Verification." The Elements of
Journalism. London: Atlantic, 2003. Pp. 47-68 Print.  
            Thevenot, Brian. "Katrina's body count could reach 10,000." The Times-Picayune

[New Orleans ] 06 Sept. 2005: 8. The Times-Picayune. Print.